The
Amendments to the Constitution after the 1st ten (the Bill of
Rights) are a mixed bag of good and bad ideas, clarifications or definitions,
and attempts to overcome the protections that the Constitutionoriginally
guaranteed the citizens of the United States. Only two additional Amendments
were ratified before the end of the Civil War in 1865 and only three more from
that period until 1913 when the first of a number of questionable Amendments
were created. In all during that 100 years we have created and ratified 12 more
Amendments, some of which have either been bad ideas or unnecessary. I abide by
and respect the law created by these 12, but disagree with and am working to
rescind a few of them, just as we rescinded the 18th when we
realized it was a bad idea.
Good ideas
and clarifications - #11 clarified the role of the judiciary in lawsuits, #12
defined and clarified the process of electing the president and vice president,
#13 outlawed slavery, #14 clarified equal rights and protections and applied
them to all citizens, defined requirements for the election of members of
Congress, and identified what is and is not a valid debt of the government. #15
extended the vote to all male citizens and #19 extended it to women, while #26
extended it to all citizens over age 18. #24 restricts the government from stopping
anyone from voting because of failure to pay a poll tax or any other tax. #20, #22 and #25 identify the terms of office
for elected Federal officials and the way successors to the President should be
chosen in case of death or inability to continue.
As you can
see, most of these amendments were designed to make the government work better,
correct problems that were politically unfixable at the time the Constitution
was written (slavery, etc.) or expand the number and type of people allowed to
vote. In general these are all good ideas with the possible exception of
allowing people to vote and decide the direction of our country that have not
studied the candidates and issues and become educated as to the history,
freedoms and responsibilities of an informed electorate.
Two
amendments, #18 and #21, cancel each other out as we outlawed alcohol and then
realized the concept was a failure and simply created a criminal element
instead of stopping people from consuming it. #23 allows the people residing in
the District of Columbia to have representation in Congress and in the choosing
of our President, but without the full benefits or responsibilities of being a
separate state. The 27th Amendment disallows any pay increases to
take effect during the current election cycle, thus decreasing the incentive
for Congressmen to vote themselves pay increases. It seems to have not had the
desired effect, since they are continuing to increase pay, even though they
already receive much more than the normal citizens and “retirement” pay that is
by far above what most of us receive.
The worst
amendments are #16 and #17. They were both passed in the same year, 1913, and
were part of a systematic effort to fundamentally change our system of
government. In my opinion, those changes were much for the worse and have
precipitated many of the problems we now face. For more info, read the book
“1913” by Oliver DeMille and Orrin Woodward. #16 created the IRS and allowed
for an individual income tax. Up until that point, all efforts to tax the
income of individuals were struck down by the Supreme Court as
unconstitutional. The government could not control or penalize your income, as
long as that income was legally created. This was the basis of the success and
prosperity of the citizens of the US, especially in comparison to the general
citizenry of any other country. The 17th Amendment took the rights
and protections of the individual states away and gave election of Senators to
the general public. This sounds like a good idea until you realize that the
Senators were a check and balance on the excessive promises of the generally
elected House of Representatives. With that check and balance removed we now
have out of control debt and laws that pander to special interests and the
“gimme” mentality instead of looking at the long term effects of spending
without restraint for unnecessary or unwise programs and redundancies.
All in all,
most of the Amendments are good or at least non-destructive. A few, however,
have set in motion things we really don’t want and should be rescinded.
No comments:
Post a Comment